1. I don’t believe the official 9/11 narrative on whether the Pentagon plane even existed, but if you do, have fun dealing with this:
“NTSB data: Flight deck door remained closed on AA77: hijacking “impossible”
“On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, “…all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers…”[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?”
There’s a bit of a “wow” factor here: this is material provided by the NTSB, the government agency charged with investigating all airplane incidents and accidents in the US. We all know that Ted Olson lied about the cell phone calls from AA77, but this flight data recorder material (provided by a government agency) throws another wrench in the official version of AA77’s fate.
…
Who cares if the mainstream media mock us as conspiracy theorists because we talk about the evidence of controlled demolition? They are still trying to convince us that Oswald killed Kennedy and that there was no conspiracy involved in the assassination. I consider it a badge of honor to be mocked by the pathetic controlled news media. Do we care more about uncovering the truth, or about how the discredited lame stream news media attacks us?”
http://www.911blogger.com/node/21980
2. Every single act by Israel is done in bad faith and malice:
“Israel Greets Start of Settlement ‘Freeze’ With New Construction”
http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/27/israel-greets-start-of-settlement-freeze-with-new-construction/
3. “On Friday, District Court Judge Gladys Kessler ordered the release from Guantánamo of Farhi Saeed bin Mohammed, a 48-year-old Algerian, after granting his habeas corpus petition. Her ruling has not yet been declassified, so the reasons for her decision are not yet clear, but it is significant that the ruling now brings to 31 the number of prisoners who have successfully challenged the basis of their detention in U.S. courts. In contrast, just eight prisoners have lost their habeas petitions, meaning that the success rate in the prisoners’ legal challenges now stands at 80 percent.
It is also likely that her ruling will, as in all the other successful petitions, involve lambasting the government for relying on statements made by other prisoners whose unreliability has been noted by the authorities, and who were either tortured, coerced, or bribed, or on statements made by the prisoners themselves while subjected to grueling and often abusive conditions. It also seems probable that the ruling will refute the government’s claims that its rag-bag of hearsay, innuendo, and snippets of intelligence is coherent enough to constitute real evidence.
…
Without a concerted effort by the administration, by lawmakers, or by the American people to address their responsibility for these men, Farhi Saeed bin Mohammed will be left to reflect that it actually makes no difference whether you have been cleared for release on three occasions, or whether you are still regarded as a threat, despite the lack of any credible evidence against you, as the end result is the same: you will, in the end, remain at Guantánamo, possibly for the rest of your life, while those who could do something about your plight either ignore the fact that there is no evidence against you, and continue to smear you as a terrorist, or remain paralyzed by inertia. “
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0911g.asp
4. “Military Coverup: Washington alters US Air Force document to hide intentions behind military accord with Colombia”
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? 
Leave a comment