1. Of course it did, from the controlled demolition of the buildings:
“DID THE EARTH SHAKE
BEFORE THE SOUTH TOWER HIT THE GROUND?”
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/MacQueen_EarlyEarthShake.pdf
2. And, related to the above:
“It is very odd that all these papers have to be written, and all this painstaking research has to be done, when 6.5 seconds observing a video of building 7 ought to be more than sufficient to convince anyone who is in possession of their mind, to realize, beyond any doubt, that that building was professionally demolished.
Once that is seen to be unquestionably true, the towers are then seen clearly – and beyond doubt – to be exploding. Why is necessary to “prove”what is beyond obvious, is very odd indeed.
…
1. The South Tower wobbled and shook ominously.
2. Flares of smoky debris shot from the building like roman candles.
3.The south tower began to fall upon itself.
That’s a pretty good chronology. You draw your own conclusions.”
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20693
3. “Despite all the posthumous praise for Cronkite’s February 1968 telecast that dubbed the war “a stalemate,” the facts of history show that the broadcast came only after Cronkite’s protracted support for the war.
…
Why does this matter now? Because citing Cronkite as an example of courageous reporting on a war is a dangerously low bar – as if reporting that a war can’t be won, after cheerleading it for years, is somehow the ultimate in journalistic quality and courage.
The biggest and most important lie about an aggressive war based on deception is not that the war can’t be won. The biggest and most important lie is deference to the conventional wisdom that insists the war must be fought in the first place and portrays it as a moral enterprise.”
http://original.antiwar.com/solomon/2009/07/20/beyond-the-hype-cronkite-and-the-vietnam-war/
4. Since the CIA lies for a living, this isn’t really much of a stretch:
“Judge accuses CIA officials of fraud, unseals secret files”
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/72176.html
5. “Blogs Are Best at Debunking Myths That Can Slip Through a Lot of the Traditional Media Outlets”
Guess who just said:
Blogs are best at debunking myths that can slip through a lot of the traditional media outlets.
…
Obama just said it.
So next time an Obama official (or someone from a future administration) tries to crack down on free speech on the Web, remind them that President Obama himself has praised blogs as a better news source – better at fact-checking and debunking myths – than the “traditional” corporate media.”
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/07/blogs-are-best-at-debunking-myths-that.html
6. “
The WHO has refused to release the Minutes of a key meeting of an advisory vaccine group – packed with executives from Baxter, Novartis and Sanofi – that recommended compulsory vaccinations in the USA, Europe and other countries against the artificial H1N1 “swine flu” virus this autumn.
…
In short: WHO has the authority to force everyone in those 194 countries to take a vaccine this fall at gunpoint, impose quarantines and restrict travel.
There is verifiable, clear and unambiguous proof that WHO supplied the live bird flu virus to Baxter’s subsidiary in Austria, which was used by Baxter to manufacture 72 kilos of vaccine material in Febuary.
Baxter subsequently sent this material out to 16 labs in four countries under a false label designating the contaminated product as vaccine material, so nearly triggering a global pandemic.
Because Baxter must adhere to strict biosafety level 3 regulations when handling a dangerus virus such as the bird flu virus, the production and distribution of so much pandemic material cannot have been an accident but must have been done by Baxter with criminal intent.
The Austrian police are now investigating after I filed criminal charges in April.”
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14475
7. “First steps taken to implement preventive detention, military commissions
In fact, the entire 2004 campaign the Democrats ran was based on the argument that Terrorism should be treated far more like a law enforcement problem than a “war.” John Kerry famously said: “The war on terror is far less of a military operation and far more of an intelligence-gathering law-enforcement operation.”
…
That the extant system of American justice was perfectly adequate to try accused Terrorists — and that whole new systems of “justice” need not be created in the name of so-called “war powers – was long a central plank of Democratic and progressive objections to the Bush/Cheney approach to Terrorism.
What happened to all of that? As of January 20, 2009, it seems to have disappeared in a cloud of obfuscating smoke, replaced by chest-beating “war”-rhetoric used to justify the creation of whole new “systems of justice” and, worse, locking people up with no trial. Like all new powers vested in the President, once this system is institutionalized, it will be virtually impossible ever to abolish it, or even to prevent its continued expansion.”
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/
